The martingale is a negative-progression gambling system (it raises bets after losses), and it is typically used when bets pay 1:1, as in roulette, baccarat, or craps. The player wagers one unit after every win, and doubles the wager after every loss…two, four, eight, sixteen, until a win. The result is always a one-unit profit, assuming the series ends with a win. And that's the problem; there is no guarantee that consecutive losses won't bunch up. For example:
Bet #1 |
Wager = 10 |
Net If Win = 10 |
Net If Loss = -10 |
Bet #2 |
Wager = 20 |
Net If Win = 10 |
Net If Loss = -30 |
Bet #3 |
Wager = 40 |
Net If Win = 10 |
Net If Loss = -70 |
Bet #4 |
Wager = 80 |
Net If Win = 10 |
Net If Loss = -150 |
Bet #5 |
Wager = 160 |
Net If Win = 10 |
Net If Loss = -310 |
Bet #6 |
Wager = 320 |
Net If Win = 10 |
Net If Loss = -630 |
Bet #7 |
Wager = 640 |
Net If Win = 10 |
Net If Loss = -1,270 |
What is the probability of seeing seven consecutive loses? It’s 1 in 128 on a coin-flip-style 50/50 proposition. The true odds are worse when playing casino games that pay 1:1 (roulette, baccarat, craps, blackjack). For example, the odds for seven consecutive craps or baccarat losses are about 1 in 116. Roulette is about 1 in 90. Still pretty unlikely, right? Yes, but consider the actual wager. The gambler is risking $1,270 against the casino’s $10 that seven consecutive losses won't occur. What a dumb bet! The probability of "hitting the wall" and losing X dollars is always greater than the probability of winning X dollars in the interim to cover the loss. In other words, a player will probably lose $1,270 on a bad streak when using the martingale before he wins that much.
Thus the martingale is always a long-term loser. It’s unavoidable.
ReadyBetGo! is an independent gambling news and information service. If you plan to play in casinos, ensure
that you are not breaking any local laws. It's up to you to know the legality of your actions when you gamble.